- SEO Services - Jet Charter Broker

Google | search engines | Delhi High Court
Neha Alawadhi  |  New Delhi  Last Updated at June 3, 2021 00:59 IST

Global technology giant on Wednesday moved (HC), asking for interim protection against its declaration as a 'social media intermidiary'.
petitioned to set aside a part of an April order that "mischaracterises" its search engine as a social media intermediary that has to comply with the new Information Technology (IT) Rules, 2021.document.write(““);googletag.cmd.push(function(){googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot(‘/6516239/outofpage_1x1_desktop’,’div-gpt-ad-1490771277198-0′).addService(googletag.pubads());googletag.pubads().enableSyncRendering();googletag.enableServices();});


var banHeight=$(“.article-middle-banner iframe”).height();if(banHeight<=1){$(".article-middle-banner").height(0);$(".article-middle-banner").next().next().remove();}displayConBanner=1;
Experts agreed there may be merit in asking not to be identified as a social media intermediary.
"are a reflection of the content and information available on the internet. While we maintain a consistent policy over removal of objectionable content from the search results, the Delhi HC order has cast certain obligations that would wrongly classify as a social media intermediary,” said a spokesperson for Google.
The Delhi HC had identified as an 'intermediary' in April as part of a case where a woman's pictures had been uploaded on a pornographic website without her consent. Despite court orders, the content could not be removed in entirety from the worldwide web.
The April 20 order issued a direction "to Google Search, Yahoo Search, Microsoft Bing, DuckDuckGo to endeavour to use automated tools, to proactively identify and globally disable access to any content which is exactly identical to the offending content that may appear on any other websites/online platforms".
“We’ve filed an appeal against this part of the order and look forward to explaining the steps we take to remove objectionable content from results,” the spokesperson added.
Google's contention is that a search engine has a different role compared to a social media intermediary such as Facebook, Instagram or Twitter. It had also submitted to the court in April that on the issue of removal of content or blocking access, the role of the search engine is reactive and limited to disabling access to specific uniform resource locators from the search results, once these are reported by governmental agencies or ordered by court. do not have a proactive role.
“The single judge has misinterpreted and misapplied the new IT Rules, 2021, to the appellant’s search engine. Additionally, the single judge has conflated various sections of the IT Act and separate rules prescribed thereunder, and has passed template orders combining all such offences and provisions, which is bad in law,” Google has said in its appeal against the April 20 judgment.
It further said the April order issued "directions that would empower the local police and the criminal and civil courts to issue directions for take-down of websites and content, overlooking that the IT Act balances the freedom of speech and expression with powers of regulation of content by enacting a comprehensive code".
The court has issued notices to the Centre, Delhi government, Internet Service Providers Association of India, Facebook, the pornographic site and the woman, on whose plea the April ruling had come, and sought their responses to Google’s plea by July 25.

The IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, published on February 25, detail new guidelines for platforms identified as intermediaries.
Legal experts said there was some merit in Google's argument.
The new IT Rules, 2021, define a social media intermediary as an entity that primarily or solely enables online interaction between two or more users and allows them to create, upload, share, disseminate, modify or access information using its services.
"The exceptions to this rule are intermediaries, which primarily enable commercial or business-oriented transactions, provide access to internet or computer networks, or is a search engine, online encyclopaedia, online directory or suggestion tool, email service or online storage service," said Sajai Singh, partner, J Sagar Associates.
"If the court was to accept the view being proposed by Google, then, though it may be an intermediary, with a subscription base larger than the thresholds provided, they may have some relief with regard to appointment of various officers, which a significant social media intermediary needs to appoint. I guess, the government may argue on other compliances like due diligence and take-down requirements," added Singh.
Atul Pandey, partner at Khaitan & Co, said, "Google’s contention that it is not a social media intermediary under the new IT Rules, 2021, but rather a search engine, may have merit, considering Google cannot be construed to be a ‘social media’ company having in excess of 5 million registered users (which is the threshold for being treated a social media intermediary. While Google has, in the past, conceded to being an intermediary under the IT Rules, given its role as a search engine, it may not qualify as a social media intermediary."
In the April order, the court noted Google's submission that "intermediaries that run search engines are not ‘publishers’ and that they merely ‘index’ existing information online and to that extent have only a limited role, owing to the automated manner of functioning of search engines. It has also been emphasised that the legal framework mandates that the internet be kept free from editorial intervention”.
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor
Copyrights © 2021 Business Standard Private Ltd. All rights reserved.
Business Standard
Upgrade To Premium Services
Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of “Business Standard Premium Services”
As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:
Business Standard
Premium Services
In Partnership with Fis Logo
Dear Guest,
Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard