News Corp is a network of leading companies in the worlds of diversified media, news, education, and information services.
MEGHAN Markle and Prince Harry's Time Magazine cover is a "stab in the heart" of the Queen's reputation, an expert has claimed.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were this week named in the magazine's list of top 100 most influential people in the world.
Glossy pictures showed Harry standing behind his 40-year-old wife with his arms on her right shoulder.
And Time’s picture editor Dilys Ng said the portrait captures the Sussexes’ “powerful dynamic as equal partners”.
But Eric Schiffer, chairman of Reputation Management Consultants, told Newsweek: "Meghan and Harry landing a cover spot of Time Magazine's 100 Most Influential People will be seen as a stab in the heart of the Monarchy's reputation because of the greater implicit credibility it affords them and their previous claims against the crown."
The couple's inclusion in the list comes six months after they accused an unnamed member of the Royal Family of racism in their explosive Oprah interview.
Meghan also told Oprah she felt suicidal while working as a royal – but that staff had dismissed her pleas for help.
Schiffer added: "The strategy Harry's built is to out gun William and to be seen as the authentic prince on a global stage and it's been beautifully executed.
"They're very disciplined at it.
"The combination of the leaks and the framing of themselves in part as victims of certain behaviour and on top of that connecting in such authentic ways with global Gen Z and Millennial audiences and allowing them to actually feel what it's like to interact with a member of the royal family, that on a human level has been powerful."
? Read our Meghan and Harry live blog for the latest updates
Meghan and Harry's entry in Time mag was listed under the “Icons” section, and joined prestigious names who have also graced the magazine's cover – including Barack Obama, the first black US president.
A short profile accompanied it, but glossed over the couple's royal rift.
José Andrés, whose food relief charity works closely with the Archewell Foundation, wrote: “In a world where everyone has an opinion about people they don’t know, the Duke and Duchess have compassion for the people they don’t know. They don’t just opine. They run toward the struggle.
"Springing into action is not the easy choice for a young duke and duchess who have been blessed through birth and talent, and burned by fame.
“It would be much safer to enjoy their good fortune and stay silent.
“That’s not what Harry and Meghan do, or who they are. They turn compassion into boots on the ground through their Archewell Foundation.”
Writing on their website shortly after the news broke, Meghan and Harry said they were "humbled to be part of this year’s TIME 100" and went on to praise the Director-General of the World Trade Organization, Okonjo-Iweala, who was also shortlisted.
They wrote: "Each of us can change our communities, all of us can change the world."
Suspect, 31, who 'killed 3 kids & mum on sleepover' pictured
Brazil star Hulk announces his NIECE is pregnant with his fourth child
Third Strictly Come Dancing pro refuses vaccine as show crisis deepens
Ant and Dec's Street Car Showdown axed by BBC before an episode even aired
©News Group Newspapers Limited in England No. 679215 Registered office: 1 London Bridge Street, London, SE1 9GF. “The Sun”, “Sun”, “Sun Online” are registered trademarks or trade names of News Group Newspapers Limited. This service is provided on News Group Newspapers’ Limited’s Standard Terms and Conditions in accordance with our Privacy & Cookie Policy. To inquire about a licence to reproduce material, visit our Syndication site. View our online Press Pack. For other inquiries, Contact Us. To see all content on The Sun, please use the Site Map. The Sun website is regulated by the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO)
Our journalists strive for accuracy but on occasion we make mistakes. For further details of our complaints policy and to make a complaint please click this link: thesun.co.uk/editorial-complaints/

source