10 Strong Benefits of SEO for Your Business

Get 14 Days Free

Female CEO
ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood is still a financial media favourite. Chief executive Abby Johnson transformed Fidelity Investments from a firm reliant on active management of traditional mutual funds to one that now offers financial advice, brokerage services, and index funds. Chief executive Sallie Krawcheck, who launched Ellevest as a digital financial adviser for women, is an outspoken (and often quoted) proponent of closing the gender pay gap.
Don’t let these successful headline makers fool you, though: women still hold a disproportionately small number of CEO roles among US companies. How small? Only 8% of the companies on Morningstar’s inaugural list of the best companies to own are led by female CEOs.
Of course, buying a stock simply because the company’s CEO is a woman doesn’t make any more investment sense than buying a stock simply because the company’s CEO is a man. Instead, you want to examine fundamentals, consider valuation, and apply whatever other investment metrics matter to you before buying. Moreover, CEOs come and go. That woman-led company may be managed by a man, and vice versa, soon enough.
But given International Women’s Day, today we’re highlighting the companies with female CEOs that made our list of the best companies to own in 2022. They earned their spot on the list by having carved out wide Morningstar Economic Moat Ratings and having made smart capital decisions.
Here’s a closer look at three of the names from the list.
“Accenture is one of the largest IT services companies in the world, providing both consulting and outsourcing capabilities. We think that Accenture’s growth will remain at a healthy and gradual pace, rather than experience a massive uptick. Still, with the company’s prominent reputation, which we believe to be crucial to the consulting business, and its proven ability to bring expertise to a gamut of enterprise issues, we are confident Accenture will maintain its wide economic moat.
“As a consultant, Accenture provides solutions for specific enterprise problems as well as broad-scope strategies in addition to integrating software for more than 75% of the global top 500 companies. As an outsourcer, Accenture offers business process outsourcing like procurement services as well as application management. Slicing across both divisions, Accenture has stressed the increasing portion of its business as ‘the new.’ This includes its digital marketing agency, Accenture Interactive, as well as its applied intelligence, supply chain, cloud, and security services. In our opinion, however, there is always something new in the realm of enterprise technology to keep Accenture relevant and engaged with its most important customers.
“In our view, Accenture’s wide moat stems from intangible assets associated with a stellar reputation for reliability and strategic and technological know-how, especially with large, risk-averse enterprise customers. We also believe Accenture benefits from high customer switching costs as its key customers are loathe to switch service providers for large or ongoing contracts. Further, we think Accenture generates industry-leading returns on capital because of its scale, given that there are only so many blueprints and software partners that an IT services company needs to solve enterprise problems. Plus, with Accenture having one of the largest IT workforces (at half a million) and an industry-leading number of diamond accounts (typically $100 million annually or more), smaller IT-services companies may find it hard to keep up with the increasing innovation and know-how required to service enterprise technology.” Julie Bhusal Sharma, analyst
“The pandemic prompted consumers to scour the shelves for Clorox’s fare, boosting sales. And even as volume growth is decelerating, we don’t think consumers are turning their backs on Clorox’s cleaning and disinfecting products, as sales remain well above where they were before the pandemic. For one, its health and wellness arm (around 40% of sales, housing its retail and professional cleaning operations) was up 20% in the first and second fiscal quarters on a two-year stack basis. Further evidencing the strength of its brand mix, Clorox just posted its second consecutive quarter of double-digit market share gains in the disinfecting wipes aisle.
“We expect management will continue investing to ensure that its prowess holds. In this context, Clorox intends to invest $500 million over the next five years to bolster its digital capabilities (in light of the stepped-up e-commerce adoption that has taken hold throughout the pandemic) and to look for additional productivity advancements throughout the organisation, which we view as a prudent way to fuel further investments.
“But Clorox (along with a host of players in an array of industries) is facing a rampant surge in broad-based cost pressures (qualitatively referred to as unprecedented relative to the past few decades). In this vein, management indicated higher manufacturing and logistics costs were a 640-basis-point drain in the second quarter, and commodity price inflation ate into gross margins by another 510 basis points. Despite this, we’re encouraged that its rhetoric suggests investments in innovation and marketing will still take top billing from a capital allocation perspective, which we view as judicious. Our forecast calls for Clorox to expend a low-double-digit percentage of sales toward research, development, and marketing on an annual basis. We view this spending as particularly critical against the current backdrop (elevated inflation and intense competition). More specifically, Clorox goes to bat with lower-priced private-label offerings in most of the categories in which it plays, but we think investments in innovation and marketing should help its fare stand out on the shelf and stifle trading down.” Erin Lash, sector director
“Zoetis is the undisputed leader in the global animal health industry, and we believe it possesses the widest moat of all the competitors. Zoetis has set itself apart based on its impressive innovation that shows up across its product portfolio, including a number of drugs for specific pet ailments such as separation anxiety. The firm has also sought to expand its presence into virtually every type of animal-related health market, including aquaculture and pet diagnostics.
“The animal health industry had long been largely ignored because these businesses were buried within larger human health companies, but no longer. It has many attractive characteristics, including cash-pay buyers, a fragmented customer base, and minimal generic competition. Because of the fragmented and cash-pay customer base, animal drugmakers hold significant pricing power. On the human health side, firms are traditionally at the mercy of payers. Government payers or large managed-care firms with pharmacy benefit managers have more power to force generic utilization, squash price increases, and even in extreme cases force price cuts from drug manufacturers. However, animal health products are purchased by a fragmented group of protein producers, veterinarians, and pet owners, allowing very little bargaining power over the highly concentrated animal health firms.
“This industry also benefits from favourable growth tailwinds that should allow Zoetis to increase revenue at a low-double-digit long-term growth rate. On the production animal side, rising standards of living in emerging markets should lead to wider adoption of meat-heavy diets, driving greater demand for livestock products. On the companion side, Zoetis benefits from pet owners’ increasingly strong relationships with pets as members of the family, which drastically increases their willingness to pay for expensive treatments. We expect Zoetis to grow faster than the industry and maintain above-average margins owing to its scale and its shift toward the faster-growing companion animal segment. Zoetis’ investments in dermatology and parasiticide innovation have been paying off handsomely here.” Debbie Wang, senior analyst
The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person’s sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

For the third year running, we look at how many funds are run by women and how many are run by…

<p class="article__deck" d…

International Women’s Day: Here are five women whose work in financial advice has taken them b…
As women gain wealth, advisors must prepare to serve them.
International Women’s Day wasn’t all doom and gloom, but beyond the warm words lay plenty of very…
Mining companies are operating in a challenging environment but could now be the time to top up o…
THE WEEK: Morningstar columnist Rodney Hobson provides two pieces of advice to George Osborne, an…
Businesses that have competitive advantages within their industry are good candidates for dividen…
Morningstar reveals the top 10 best performers over the last five years
Morningstar OBSR reveals the top funds for investors seeking exposure to European equities
As women gain wealth, advisors must prepare to serve them.
International Women’s Day wasn’t all doom and gloom, but beyond the warm words lay plenty of very…
In a week of more atrocities, readers were greeted with the dissonant topic of International Wome…
Financial warfare intensifies ahead of MPs’ vote on restricting companies from listing and raisin…
Novice investor Anna Vaughan is hoping her sustainable investment funds with Triodos will help bu…
Susan Dziubinski  Susan Dziubinski is senior product manager with Morningstar.com.
About Us
Connect With Us
Get Help
Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings
The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst’s estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock’s fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn’t. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here
Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here